MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Hazem Naow [574th] vs Johan Nikles [639th] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

H2H: Naow 1 - 0 Nikles

They have played 2 sets in total, with Naow winning 2 and Nikles winning 0. The last match between Naow and Nikles was at the M15 Pontevedra, 12-10-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Hazem Naow getting the victory 7-6(7) 6-4.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Hazem Naow 1
Johan Nikles 0
Naow vs Nikles H2H Profile
Naow Stats Nikles
0% (0-1) YTD Win/Loss 56% (9-7)
1 Head-to-Head 0
574 Ranking 639
299 Highest Rank 256
25 Age 28
- Plays R
4 Titles 4
64% (170-97) Career Total W/L 58% (296-213)
$0 Career Prize Money $11,650
1 Hard H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Naow VS Nikles H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
7-6(7) 6-4
cross
Hazem Naow
Player
Johan Nikles
60% ( 39 of 65)
1st Serve %
65% ( 53 of 82)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67% ( 26 of 39)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 30 of 53)
42% ( 11 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 12 of 29)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
67% ( 4 of 6)
43% ( 28 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 40 of 82)
77
Total Points Won
70

Naow VS Nikles H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Naow Vs Nikles H2H Stats
Hazem Naow Naow Stats Johan Nikles Nikles
1 H2H Matches 0
2 Sets Won 0
13 Games Won 10
4 Aces (Total) 1
3 Total Double Faults 3
2:7:0 Average Match Time 2:7:0
60% (39/65) 1st Serve % 65% (53/82)
67% (26/39) 1st Serve Win % 57% (30/53)
42% (11/26) 2nd Serve Win % 41% (12/29)
50% (5/10) Break Points Won % (Total) 67% (4/6)
49% (40/82) Return Points Win % 43% (28/65)
100% (1/1) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 0% (0/1)
0% (0/0) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0)
0% (1/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Hazem Naow vs Johan Nikles Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Naow 1 - 0 Nikles

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naow has won 43.17% of points on their second serve, while Nikles has won 42.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naow, in recent form, has won 42.97% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nikles has won 46.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.22% and 28.23% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Naow has saved 63.27% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nikles has saved 51.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Naow has won 50% of matches played (W/L 19/ 19), with Nikles winning 60% (W/L 33/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Naow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 75/ 32), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 60/ 44). Nikles has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 88/ 55), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 23% (W/L 3/ 10).
  • Player level: In the last year, Naow has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.31% of matches (W/L 11/ 15), where as Nikles has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.04% of matches (W/L 29/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Naow winning 1 times and Nikles being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Naow winning 2 and Nikles winning 0. The last match between Naow and Nikles was at the M15 Pontevedra, 12-10-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Hazem Naow getting the victory 7-6(7) 6-4.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Naow and Nikles have played a deciding set 0 times, with Naow winning 0 times and Nikles 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Naow winning 1, and Nikles 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naow has played against opponents with an average rank of 375.47 while Nikles has played against players with an average rank of 324.85.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naow has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nikles has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Naow has converted 14.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nikles has converted 38.2% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Sebastian Fanselow
    Player
    Hazem Naow
    53% ( 33 of 62)
    1st Serve %
    57% ( 33 of 58)
    5
    Aces
    3
    5
    Double Faults
    8
    70% ( 23 of 33)
    1st Serve Won
    67% ( 22 of 33)
    52% ( 15 of 29)
    2nd Serve Won
    28% ( 7 of 25)
    45% ( 5 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 2 of 8)
    39% ( 24 of 62)
    Rtn Points Won
    50% ( 29 of 58)
    67
    Total Points Won
    53
    L
    6-3 6-3 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Sergi Perez Contri
    Player
    Hazem Naow
    73% ( 45 of 62)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 42 of 64)
    3
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    1
    60% ( 27 of 45)
    1st Serve Won
    57% ( 24 of 42)
    71% ( 12 of 17)
    2nd Serve Won
    41% ( 9 of 22)
    50% ( 4 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    14% ( 1 of 7)
    37% ( 23 of 62)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 31 of 64)
    70
    Total Points Won
    56
    L
    6-4 6-2 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Hazem Naow
    Player
    Alejandro Melero Kretzer
    60% ( 28 of 47)
    1st Serve %
    71% ( 60 of 85)
    1
    Aces
    2
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    86% ( 24 of 28)
    1st Serve Won
    60% ( 36 of 60)
    68% ( 13 of 19)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 12 of 25)
    21% ( 3 of 14)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    21% ( 10 of 47)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 37 of 85)
    74
    Total Points Won
    58
    W
    6-3 6-3 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Oleg Prihodko
    Player
    Hazem Naow
    65% ( 80 of 124)
    1st Serve %
    61% ( 65 of 107)
    12
    Aces
    8
    1
    Double Faults
    1
    65% ( 52 of 80)
    1st Serve Won
    68% ( 44 of 65)
    50% ( 22 of 44)
    2nd Serve Won
    57% ( 24 of 42)
    20% ( 2 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    15% ( 2 of 13)
    40% ( 50 of 124)
    Rtn Points Won
    36% ( 39 of 107)
    113
    Total Points Won
    118
    L
    6-3 3-6 7-6(5) H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Hazem Naow
    Player
    Matisse Bobichon
    65% ( 35 of 54)
    1st Serve %
    52% ( 27 of 52)
    1
    Aces
    5
    0
    Double Faults
    0
    74% ( 26 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    74% ( 20 of 27)
    58% ( 11 of 19)
    2nd Serve Won
    32% ( 8 of 25)
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 5)
    31% ( 17 of 54)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 24 of 52)
    61
    Total Points Won
    45
    W
    6-3 6-2 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Benjamin Bonzi
    Player
    Hazem Naow
    62% ( 40 of 65)
    1st Serve %
    53% ( 31 of 59)
    4
    Aces
    2
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    70% ( 28 of 40)
    1st Serve Won
    61% ( 19 of 31)
    56% ( 14 of 25)
    2nd Serve Won
    39% ( 11 of 28)
    36% ( 4 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    14% ( 1 of 7)
    35% ( 23 of 65)
    Rtn Points Won
    49% ( 29 of 59)
    71
    Total Points Won
    53
    L
    6-1 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Hazem Naow
    Player
    Mika Brunold
    62% ( 38 of 61)
    1st Serve %
    57% ( 39 of 69)
    2
    Aces
    6
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    71% ( 27 of 38)
    1st Serve Won
    67% ( 26 of 39)
    70% ( 16 of 23)
    2nd Serve Won
    57% ( 17 of 30)
    22% ( 2 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 3)
    30% ( 18 of 61)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 26 of 69)
    69
    Total Points Won
    61
    W
    6-4 6-4 H2H
    SF
    cross
    Yaroslav Demin
    Player
    Hazem Naow
    57% ( 31 of 54)
    1st Serve %
    54% ( 28 of 52)
    4
    Aces
    3
    5
    Double Faults
    4
    84% ( 26 of 31)
    1st Serve Won
    71% ( 20 of 28)
    57% ( 13 of 23)
    2nd Serve Won
    42% ( 10 of 24)
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    28% ( 15 of 54)
    Rtn Points Won
    42% ( 22 of 52)
    61
    Total Points Won
    45
    L
    6-3 6-2 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Hazem Naow
    Player
    Johan Nikles
    60% ( 39 of 65)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 53 of 82)
    4
    Aces
    1
    3
    Double Faults
    3
    67% ( 26 of 39)
    1st Serve Won
    57% ( 30 of 53)
    42% ( 11 of 26)
    2nd Serve Won
    41% ( 12 of 29)
    50% ( 5 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    43% ( 28 of 65)
    Rtn Points Won
    49% ( 40 of 82)
    77
    Total Points Won
    70
    W
    7-6(7) 6-4 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Hazem Naow
    Player
    Luis Garcia Paez
    57% ( 29 of 51)
    1st Serve %
    70% ( 37 of 53)
    6
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    0
    83% ( 24 of 29)
    1st Serve Won
    62% ( 23 of 37)
    68% ( 15 of 22)
    2nd Serve Won
    56% ( 9 of 16)
    50% ( 3 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 3)
    24% ( 12 of 51)
    Rtn Points Won
    40% ( 21 of 53)
    60
    Total Points Won
    44
    W
    6-3 6-3 H2H

    Johan Nikles Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    QF
    cross
    Stefanos Sakellaridis
    Player
    Johan Nikles
    65% ( 56 of 86)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 50 of 76)
    4
    Aces
    0
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    71% ( 40 of 56)
    1st Serve Won
    48% ( 24 of 50)
    40% ( 12 of 30)
    2nd Serve Won
    62% ( 16 of 26)
    58% ( 7 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    40% ( 34 of 86)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 36 of 76)
    88
    Total Points Won
    74
    L
    5-7 6-2 6-2 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Johan Nikles
    Player
    Alexis Canter
    80% ( 48 of 60)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 32 of 57)
    1
    Aces
    0
    3
    Double Faults
    3
    65% ( 31 of 48)
    1st Serve Won
    56% ( 18 of 32)
    50% ( 6 of 12)
    2nd Serve Won
    36% ( 9 of 25)
    50% ( 5 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 3 of 3)
    38% ( 23 of 60)
    Rtn Points Won
    53% ( 30 of 57)
    67
    Total Points Won
    50
    W
    6-4 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Johan Nikles
    Player
    Billy Suarez
    57% ( 36 of 63)
    1st Serve %
    57% ( 34 of 60)
    0
    Aces
    1
    3
    Double Faults
    1
    61% ( 22 of 36)
    1st Serve Won
    41% ( 14 of 34)
    59% ( 16 of 27)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 13 of 26)
    56% ( 5 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 3 of 6)
    40% ( 25 of 63)
    Rtn Points Won
    55% ( 33 of 60)
    71
    Total Points Won
    52
    W
    6-1 7-6(5) H2H
    R1
    cross
    Guillaume Dalmasso
    Player
    Johan Nikles
    51% ( 23 of 45)
    1st Serve %
    76% ( 39 of 51)
    2
    Aces
    0
    4
    Double Faults
    3
    74% ( 17 of 23)
    1st Serve Won
    44% ( 17 of 39)
    55% ( 12 of 22)
    2nd Serve Won
    17% ( 2 of 12)
    100% ( 6 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    67% ( 2 of 3)
    36% ( 16 of 45)
    Rtn Points Won
    63% ( 32 of 51)
    61
    Total Points Won
    35
    L
    7-5 6-0 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Ilya Ivashka
    Player
    Johan Nikles
    92% ( 48 of 52)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 37 of 57)
    0
    Aces
    0
    0
    Double Faults
    2
    71% ( 34 of 48)
    1st Serve Won
    51% ( 19 of 37)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 9 of 20)
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 2)
    29% ( 15 of 52)
    Rtn Points Won
    51% ( 29 of 57)
    66
    Total Points Won
    43
    L
    6-2 6-2 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
    Player
    Johan Nikles
    56% ( 42 of 75)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 55 of 93)
    2
    Aces
    2
    6
    Double Faults
    8
    69% ( 29 of 42)
    1st Serve Won
    58% ( 32 of 55)
    39% ( 13 of 33)
    2nd Serve Won
    37% ( 14 of 38)
    40% ( 6 of 15)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 4 of 8)
    44% ( 33 of 75)
    Rtn Points Won
    51% ( 47 of 93)
    89
    Total Points Won
    79
    L
    7-5 6-4 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Murphy Cassone
    Player
    Johan Nikles
    69% ( 44 of 64)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 42 of 71)
    4
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    73% ( 32 of 44)
    1st Serve Won
    60% ( 25 of 42)
    60% ( 12 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    52% ( 15 of 29)
    38% ( 3 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    31% ( 20 of 64)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 31 of 71)
    75
    Total Points Won
    60
    L
    7-5 6-3 H2H
    F
    cross
    Cem Ilkel
    Player
    Johan Nikles
    68% ( 25 of 37)
    1st Serve %
    55% ( 31 of 56)
    2
    Aces
    0
    0
    Double Faults
    2
    84% ( 21 of 25)
    1st Serve Won
    52% ( 16 of 31)
    58% ( 7 of 12)
    2nd Serve Won
    28% ( 7 of 25)
    45% ( 5 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    24% ( 9 of 37)
    Rtn Points Won
    59% ( 33 of 56)
    61
    Total Points Won
    32
    L
    6-1 6-1 H2H
    SF
    cross
    Johan Nikles
    Player
    Tuncay Duran
    67% ( 28 of 42)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 23 of 37)
    0
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    79% ( 22 of 28)
    1st Serve Won
    48% ( 11 of 23)
    50% ( 7 of 14)
    2nd Serve Won
    29% ( 4 of 14)
    50% ( 5 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 4)
    31% ( 13 of 42)
    Rtn Points Won
    59% ( 22 of 37)
    51
    Total Points Won
    28
    W
    6-2 6-0 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Johan Nikles
    Player
    Valentin Lapalu
    61% ( 30 of 49)
    1st Serve %
    67% ( 33 of 49)
    0
    Aces
    0
    4
    Double Faults
    3
    73% ( 22 of 30)
    1st Serve Won
    48% ( 16 of 33)
    53% ( 10 of 19)
    2nd Serve Won
    44% ( 7 of 16)
    83% ( 5 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    20% ( 1 of 5)
    35% ( 17 of 49)
    Rtn Points Won
    53% ( 26 of 49)
    58
    Total Points Won
    40
    W
    6-3 6-2 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Naow & Nikles Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Hazem Naow Naow Stats Johan Nikles Nikles
    64% (170/97) Win/Loss 58% (296/213)
    62% (374/233) Sets Win/Loss 56% (655/506)
    54% (3061/2561) Games Win/Loss 53% (5643/5025)
    0.14 Aces Per Game 0.06
    385 Aces Total 312
    0.25 Double Faults Per Game 0.2
    690 Total Double Faults 1066
    1:22:11 Average Match Time 1:22:24
    400.32 Average Opponent Rank 492.7
    67% (9776/14507) 1st Serve % 67% (19180/28773)
    65% (6326/9776) 1st Serve Win % 61% (11611/19180)
    48% (2255/4731) 2nd Serve Win % 48% (4564/9593)
    46% (801/1757) Break Points Won % (Total) 46% (1651/3579)
    44% (6478/14781) Return Points Win % 45% (13074/29005)
    63% (166/262) Best of 3 Sets Win % 58% (292/501)
    100% (2/2) Best of 5 Sets Win % 100% (1/1)
    53% (32/60) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 54% (58/108)
    51% (38/74) Deciding Set Win % 56% (83/149)
    90% (165/148) 1st Set Won, Won Match 88% (277/244)
    10% (165/17) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 12% (277/32)
    22% (102/22) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 22% (232/52)

    Other Predictions

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    11:00
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    11:00
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...